| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql performance |
| Date: | 2005-04-15 05:00:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20050415050044.GP58835@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:05:37PM -0400, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> Incidentally when I did that I only got back one row. What's up with that?
That's PostgreSQL acting according to ANSI SQL. If you want multiple
rows, you need UNION ALL.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-15 05:06:31 | Re: UNION messing up sorting WAS: psql performance |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-04-15 04:50:16 | Re: psql performance |