From: | Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au |
Subject: | Re: PLM pulling from CVS nightly for testing in STP |
Date: | 2005-04-13 20:41:48 |
Message-ID: | 20050413204148.GC7095@osdl.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:35:36AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Mark,
>
> > Just wanted everyone to know what we're pulling CVS HEAD nightly so it
> > can be tested in STP now. Let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Way cool. How do I find the PLM number? How are you nameing these?
The naming convention I'm using is postgresql-YYYYMMDD, for example
postgresql-20050413, for the anonymous cvs export from today (April
13). I have a cronjob that'll do the export at 1AM PST8PDT.
The search page for the PLM numbers is here:
https://www.osdl.org/plm-cgi/plm?module=search
or you can use the stpbot on linuxnet.mit.edu#osdl.
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-13 22:27:20 | Re: Compressing WAL |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-13 19:43:03 | Re: System vs non-system casts |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Mack | 2005-04-13 21:06:57 | Problem with slow query (caused by improper nestloop?) |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-13 18:35:36 | Re: PLM pulling from CVS nightly for testing in STP |