| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias Loitsch <m(at)tthias(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Foreign Keys Question | 
| Date: | 2005-04-13 16:00:02 | 
| Message-ID: | 20050413160002.GA21890@wolff.to | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 13:54:05 +0200,
  Matthias Loitsch <m(at)tthias(dot)com> wrote:
> 
> So I thought I could make a foreign key on a different Schema (db), and
> use the same table....
> 
> And well, thats where I started to search if this is possible ... and,
> in fact my main question is: Is this a good idea?
> I have no idea if this will be fast enough, or if I will have lots of
> problems afterward....
> 
> Could anyone help me with this ?
Schemas are just a name space, so using foreign keys accross schemas
shouldn't be a problem.
However, it you later put the contents of the schema on other server
or even in another database, then you are going to need to make a copy
of the data as you can't make foreign key references outside of
the current database.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-04-13 16:37:51 | Re: psql vs perl prepared inserts | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-13 15:50:41 | Re: Composite type versus Domain constraints. |