From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Possible copy error in explain example |
Date: | 2005-04-12 04:34:21 |
Message-ID: | 20050412043421.GA60302@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:40:01PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I was looking at:
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/performance-tips.html
>
> And noticed in the first example that it is claimed the cost estimate
> is 233 disk block reads. However, "233" doesn't appear in the explain
> output shown. I think that "233" is supposed to match the "333" in
> the explain output, but I am not 100% sure.
This part?
This is about as straightforward as it gets. If you do
SELECT * FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 'tenk1';
you will find out that tenk1 has 233 disk pages and 10000 rows.
So the cost is estimated at 233 page reads, defined as costing
1.0 apiece, plus 10000 * cpu_tuple_cost which is currently 0.01
(try SHOW cpu_tuple_cost).
Doesn't that work out to
(233 * 1.0) + (10000 * 0.01) = 233.0 + 100.0 = 333.0
or am I missing something?
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-04-12 04:40:01 | Possible copy error in explain example |
Previous Message | Weiping | 2005-04-12 02:07:10 | Re: Translate Postgresql FAQ into Chinese |