From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | KeithW(at)narrowpathinc(dot)com |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL Perform" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 4 way JOIN using aliases |
Date: | 2005-04-11 01:41:05 |
Message-ID: | 200504101841.05234.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Keith,
> Thanks to all on the NOVICE list that gave me help I now have a query
> running that returns the results I am after. :-) Now of course I want it
> to run faster. Currently it clocks in at ~160ms. I have checked over the
> indexes and I belive that the tables are indexed properly. The largest
> table, tbl_item, only has 2000 rows. Is it possible to reduce the time of
> this query further?
Probably not, no. For a 7-way join including 2 LEFT JOINs on the
unrestricted contents of all tables, 160ms is pretty darned good. If these
tables were large, you'd be looking at a much longer estimation time. The
only real way to speed it up would be to find a way to eliminate the left
joins. Also, PostgreSQL 8.0 might optimize this query a little better.
The only thing I can see to tweak is that the estimate on the number of rows
in tbl_item is wrong; probably you need to ANALYZE tbl_item. But I doubt
that will make a difference in execution time.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-04-11 01:55:06 | Re: 4 way JOIN using aliases |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-11 01:29:38 | Re: Functionscan estimates |