Compressing WAL

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Compressing WAL
Date: 2005-04-05 04:04:57
Message-ID: 20050405040457.GK93835@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Maybe better for -hackers, but here it goes anyway...

Has anyone looked at compressing WAL's before writing to disk? On a
system generating a lot of WAL it seems there might be some gains to be
had WAL data could be compressed before going to disk, since today's
machines are generally more I/O bound than CPU bound. And unlike the
base tables, you generally don't need to read the WAL, so you don't
really need to worry about not being able to quickly scan through the
data without decompressing it.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-04-05 04:11:53 Re: DELETE ... USING
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-04-05 03:55:32 Re: PgFoundry.org busted?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Petrilli 2005-04-05 04:16:27 Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-05 03:57:40 Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?