From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Siegel <adam(at)sycamore(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Recovering real disk space |
Date: | 2005-04-03 13:21:19 |
Message-ID: | 20050403132119.GG27923@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 13:09:33 -0500,
Adam Siegel <adam(at)sycamore(dot)us> wrote:
>
> We perform a vacuum full after each mass delete. This cycle can happen
> many times during over a couple of weeks. We are in a test lab
> environment and are generating a lot of data.
>
> One of the problems we have is that the vacuum on the table can take up
> to 10 hours. We also expect to see the physical disk space go down, but
> this does not happen. If we accidently fill up the disk, then all bets
> are off and we are unable to recover. A vacuum never seems to finish
> (several days).
This may mean that there are open transactions pinning the records you
have deleted so that they aren't being removed by the vacuum.
Also, under some circumstances a CLUSTER can be faster than a VACUUM FULL.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-04-03 13:26:04 | Re: Empty date |
Previous Message | Mage | 2005-04-03 13:08:56 | what's the best in 8.0 |