Re: New record position

From: lucas(at)presserv(dot)org
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New record position
Date: 2005-03-30 16:17:18
Message-ID: 20050330131718.3w6hptxfu408oskw@www.presserv.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Okay, I will use the "order by" clause.
I was worried about it. I have thought that my database had crashed.
Thank you.

Quoting Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>:

> This is a feature of relational databases, you should explicitly specify
> ordering if you want persistent order.
> btw, why do you bothering ?
>
> Oleg
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 lucas(at)presserv(dot)org wrote:
>

>> Hello, ....
>> INSERT into tb1 values ('rec3','vl3');
>> SELECT * from tb1;
>> f1 | f2
>> ------|--------
>> rec1 | vl1
>> rec3 | vl3 <<=====
>> rec2 | vl2
>>
>> Why it? I can't undestand why the new record location was change.
>> Shouldn't it apper at the LAST record???

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-03-30 16:31:38 Re: RE : Foreign key
Previous Message PFC 2005-03-30 14:19:29 Re: New record position