| From: | Terry Lee Tucker <terry(at)esc1(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_index question |
| Date: | 2005-03-26 00:26:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200503251926.09897.terry@esc1.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks Tom.
One never knows until he asks...
On Friday 25 March 2005 06:36 pm, Tom Lane saith:
> Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> writes:
> > Umm, I tried it and it worked. Sure you got the right relid?
>
> I think the relation cache will probably not notice a manual update on
> pg_index. So whether it "works" or not would depend on a lot of
> extraneous factors like whether the relation cache entry was already
> built for the target table and whether you did something else that would
> force a cache rebuild.
>
> In any case, the whole idea is so fraught with pitfalls that I couldn't
> recommend it ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
--
Quote: 42
"In selecting men for office, let principle be your guide. Regard not
the particular sect or denomination of the candidate -- look to his
character...."
--Noah Webster
Work: 1-336-372-6812
Cell: 1-336-363-4719
email: terry(at)esc1(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew Terenzio | 2005-03-26 02:18:27 | TSearch2 FreeBSD |
| Previous Message | OpenMacNews | 2005-03-25 23:40:23 | Re: help w/ a little naive brainstorming ... |