| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Question about function body checking and 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-03-22 19:29:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200503222029.59873.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Implementing this type of syntax checker isn't hard since the code
> > is already there, but there might be a small, ugly problem. IIRC,
> > the parser and/or semantic analyzer of PL/pgSQL relies on knowing
> > whether the function is called as a trigger. You don't know that
> > at creation phase.
>
> Looking for RETURNS TRIGGER seems like an adequate cue for that.
Indeed... So that used to be a problem, but it seems all obstacles are
now removed.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ed L. | 2005-03-22 20:05:09 | Re: Measuring Query Performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-22 19:19:03 | Re: Question about function body checking and 8.1 |