| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? |
| Date: | 2005-03-22 13:10:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20050322131000.GA15881@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:26:24PM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On P, 2005-03-20 at 00:52 +0100, PFC wrote:
> > Also note the possibility to mark a partition READ ONLY. Or even a table.
> Would we still need regular VACUUMing of read-only table to avoid
> OID-wraparound ?
You could VACUUM FREEZE the table or partition, so you wouldn't need to
vacuum it again.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Someone said that it is at least an order of magnitude more work to do
production software than a prototype. I think he is wrong by at least
an order of magnitude." (Brian Kernighan)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2005-03-22 13:24:16 | Re: Tsearch2 performance on big database |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-03-22 13:09:40 | Re: What about utility to calculate planner cost constants? |