From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tambet Matiisen" <t(dot)matiisen(at)aprote(dot)ee> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What about utility to calculate planner cost constants? |
Date: | 2005-03-21 17:51:06 |
Message-ID: | 200503210951.06044.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tambet,
> I was following the cpu_tuple_cost thread and wondering, if it could be
> possible to make PQA style utility to calculate configuration-specific
> values for planner cost constants. It could make use of output of
> log_(statement|parser|planner|executor)_stats, tough I'm not sure if the
> output contains anything useful for those purposes.
Yeah, that's something I need to look at.
> Otherwise it could just collect statements, run EXPLAIN ANALYZE for all
> of them and then play with planner cost constants to get the estimated
> values as close as possible to actual values. Something like Goal Seek
> in Excel, if you pardon my reference to MS :).
That's not really practical. There are currently 5 major query tuning
parameters, not counting the memory adjustments which really can't be left
out. You can't realistically test all combinations of 6 variables.
> Somewhat similar project seems to be pgautotune from pgFoundry, but it
> only considers shared_buffers, sort_mem and vacuum_mem. And it seems to
> use synthetic data instead of actual database and actual statements from
> log. And it has been inactive for a while.
Yeah, pg_autotune is a dead project. Once we got OSDL able to run tests, we
came up with some rules-of-thumb which are more useful than autotune's
output. More importantly, the approach doesn't scale to the 15-20 GUCs which
we'd realistically want to test.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-03-21 17:55:03 | Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-03-21 16:32:53 | Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? |