Re: View vs function

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Keith Worthington <KeithW(at)NarrowPathInc(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: View vs function
Date: 2005-03-21 04:27:20
Message-ID: 20050321042720.GA27098@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 22:39:57 -0500,
Keith Worthington <KeithW(at)NarrowPathInc(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been reading about set returning functions. What I would like to
> know is is there a performance advantage in using SRFs versus querying a
> view. Assuming the underlying SQL is the same for the view vs the
> function except for the WHERE clause which of these would you expect to
> be faster? Or does the planner realize all this...

In general you are going to be better off with a view, since the planner
knows what the view is doing and there may be some optimizations it
can make. Functions are just black boxes to the planner.

>
> SELECT * FROM view_big_query WHERE column1 = 1234;
>
> SELECT * FROM func_bug_query(1234);
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
> Keith
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-03-21 05:13:09 Re: View vs function
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-03-21 03:47:43 Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning?