From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Rodrigo Moreno <rodrigo(dot)miguel(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Help to find out problem with joined tables |
Date: | 2005-03-17 04:42:18 |
Message-ID: | 20050317044217.GA23968@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:10:17PM -0300, Rodrigo Moreno wrote:
> If I join movest/natope, it's fast, if I join movest/produt, it's fast too,
> but when I put a third joined table, forget, it's very slow.
What version of PostgreSQL are you using?
> All tables are vacuumed by vacummdb --full --analyze, every night
> All Indexes are reindexed every night
How many updates/deletes do the tables see between vacuums?
> Movest: +- 2 milions rows, indexed
> Natope: 30 rows PK(natope_id)
> Produt: +- 1400 Rows PK(codpro)
Could you show the table definitions, or at least the definitions
for the relevant columns and indexes?
> -> Seq Scan on produt c (cost=0.00..108.26 rows=8 width=4) (actual
> time=2688.356..2875.743 rows=1 loops=6)
> Filter: ((codpro)::numeric = 629001::numeric)
What type is produt.codpro? You might be missing a potential index
scan here due to mismatched types.
The times (2688.356..2875.743) here look odd, although I might be
overlooking or misinterpreting something. I don't know what else
might cause that, but one thing that can is a lot of dead tuples
in the table, hence my question about how much activity the tables
see between vacuums. Maybe somebody else can provide a better
explanation.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mark.lubratt | 2005-03-17 06:16:24 | Join method influences scan method? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-17 03:19:13 | Re: multi-column index |