Re: interesting benchmarks PG/Firebird Linux/Windows fsync/nofsync

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: interesting benchmarks PG/Firebird Linux/Windows fsync/nofsync
Date: 2005-03-15 13:55:34
Message-ID: 200503151355.j2FDtYi13867@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Chris Mair wrote:
> Timings are in msec, note that you cannot directly
> compare Windows and Linux Performance, since machines
> were different.
>
> You can, however, compare PG to Firebird, and you
> can see the effect of the 3 varied parametert.
>
> One thing that stands out is how terribly
> bad Windows performed with many small single
> transactions and fsync=true.
>
> Appearantly fsync on Windows is a very costly
> operation.

Yes, we now enable FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH on Win32 for open_sync and I
am about to open a discussion whether this should be the default for
Win32, and whether we should backpatch this to 8.0.X.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-15 15:22:56 Re: Changing the random_page_cost default (was: cpu_tuple_cost)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-03-15 13:52:05 Re: interesting benchmarks PG/Firebird Linux/Windows fsync/nofsync