From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: interesting benchmarks PG/Firebird Linux/Windows fsync/nofsync |
Date: | 2005-03-15 13:55:34 |
Message-ID: | 200503151355.j2FDtYi13867@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Chris Mair wrote:
> Timings are in msec, note that you cannot directly
> compare Windows and Linux Performance, since machines
> were different.
>
> You can, however, compare PG to Firebird, and you
> can see the effect of the 3 varied parametert.
>
> One thing that stands out is how terribly
> bad Windows performed with many small single
> transactions and fsync=true.
>
> Appearantly fsync on Windows is a very costly
> operation.
Yes, we now enable FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH on Win32 for open_sync and I
am about to open a discussion whether this should be the default for
Win32, and whether we should backpatch this to 8.0.X.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-15 15:22:56 | Re: Changing the random_page_cost default (was: cpu_tuple_cost) |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-03-15 13:52:05 | Re: interesting benchmarks PG/Firebird Linux/Windows fsync/nofsync |