From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: cpu_tuple_cost |
Date: | 2005-03-15 02:17:52 |
Message-ID: | 200503150217.j2F2HqA01460@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > Reducing random_page_cost is usually the best way to get the
> > planner to favor indexscans more.
>
> On that note, can I raise the idea again of dropping the default
> value for random_page_cost in postgresql.conf? I think 4 is too
> conservative in this day and age. Certainly the person who will
> be negatively impacted by a default drop of 4 to 3 will be the
> exception and not the rule.
Agreed. I think we should reduce it at least to 3.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-15 02:23:29 | Re: cpu_tuple_cost |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2005-03-15 02:05:01 | Re: cpu_tuple_cost |