From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bumping libpq version number? |
Date: | 2005-03-11 21:49:23 |
Message-ID: | 200503112149.j2BLnNn27185@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
pgman wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Are we still bumping the libpq major version number for 8.0.2?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > I
> > > think it is a bad idea because we will require too many client apps
> > > to be recompiled,
> >
> > That is not true, as previously discussed.
>
> It is not true only if the old libpq stays around, which isn't always
> the case.
In fact, based on the few complaints we have heard about the current
situation, I am sure we are going to get many more complaints if we bump
up the major version in 8.0.2.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-11 21:54:38 | Re: [PATCHES] BUG #1466: syslogger issues |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-11 21:47:40 | Re: Bumping libpq version number? |