Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY

From: Mark Shewmaker <mark(at)primefactor(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY
Date: 2005-03-10 22:42:07
Message-ID: 20050310224207.GB20501@primefactor.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:44:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Would those of you with access to other DBMSes try this:
>
> create table tab (col integer);
> select 1 from tab having 1=0;
> select 1 from tab having 1=1;
> insert into tab values(1);
> insert into tab values(2);
> select 1 from tab having 1=0;
> select 1 from tab having 1=1;
>
> I claim that a SQL-conformant database will return 0, 1, 0, and 1 rows
> from the 4 selects --- that is, the contents of tab make no difference
> at all.

Sybase ASE version 12.5.2 returns 0, 0, 0, and 1 rows.

A plain "select 1 from tab" returns zero rows when tab is empty.

--
Mark Shewmaker
mark(at)primefactor(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-10 23:09:30 Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-03-10 21:37:13 Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolai Tufar 2005-03-10 22:43:48 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-03-10 21:37:13 Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP