From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tope Akinniyi <topeakinniyi(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |
Date: | 2005-03-09 04:23:43 |
Message-ID: | 20050309042343.GA14534@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:24:05AM +0000, Tope Akinniyi wrote:
> I am wondering at this display of extreme Linux mentality being
> displayed by the 'top bras' of the PostgreSQL community. And I
> ask, are we encouraging Windows use of PostgreSQL at all?
I don't see the "extreme Linux mentality" you mention, and in any
case maybe you mean "Unix mentality," where "Unix" refers to a class
of operating systems that includes but isn't limited to Linux.
Subjects like "PostgreSQL still for Linux only?" are (mis)leading
because PostgreSQL runs perfectly well on other Unix-like systems
such as FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris, and many others, to judge
from directories like src/template in the source code. Linux is
popular, but it's NOT the only Unix-like operating system around.
Unfortunately the public is coming to equate the two, with the word
"Unix" often prompting the question, "You mean Linux?"
I will concede that a lot of tools in general tend to be written
for Linux, sometimes without regard to whether they'll work even
on other Unix-like operating systems. But the PostgreSQL project
itself appears to care about portability, so the question "Still
for Linux only?" should really be directed at the third-party
software that some people find useful.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-09 04:34:36 | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |
Previous Message | Robby Russell | 2005-03-09 04:06:41 | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |