From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Terry Lee Tucker <terry(at)esc1(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Disabling triggers in a transaction |
Date: | 2005-03-09 04:05:12 |
Message-ID: | 200503090405.j2945Cr18288@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Geoffrey wrote:
> Terry Lee Tucker wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > Do you feel this is a safe method for disabling triggers in the rare cases
> > where one finds that it is prudent to do that? Do you think that the column,
> > "reltriggers", is permanent fixture in pg_class? What is your advice on this?
>
> I'd be quite interested in this as well. Can one depend on this column
> in the future? Even if not, as long as one verifies it still exists, is
> this a viable option for trigger control within a transaction?
>
> (This guy Tucker comes up with some interesting stuff...) :)
It is the only known way to control triggers though it isn't regularly
tested by the developers.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robby Russell | 2005-03-09 04:06:41 | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-03-09 03:56:27 | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |