| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Thomas F(dot)O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Eric Crampton <escpg(at)eonomine(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Matthias Schmidt <schmidtm(at)mock-software(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch |
| Date: | 2005-03-04 14:12:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200503040912.23121.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thursday 03 March 2005 19:08, Neil Conway wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> committers, myself included, deserve some blame for not making more
> rapid progress on the queue of unapplied patches for 8.1. In the
> meanwhile, the queue should be easier for folks to find (why is the
> "pgpatches" queue the only one linked from postgresql.org, but it is
> almost empty?)
>
Wow, I hadn't realized just how big that queue had gotten. I've got no qualms
adding another link to the website, but can we get a scheme wrt to links for
the various patche queues? Is pgpatches for the current stable branch and
pgpatches2 for the current development branch? (Well, that can't be true
since before 8.0 release they were both for unstable branches...)
Incidentally, I think DEV_FAQ 1.4 should be modified to include mentioning the
patch queues.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Evgen Potemkin | 2005-03-04 14:41:44 | Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-03-04 13:46:21 | Re: refactoring fork() and EXEC_BACKEND |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Bertheau | 2005-03-05 00:28:14 | Re: is it a bug ? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-03-04 10:20:07 | Re: Faster install-sh in C |