Re: logging as inserts

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Subject: Re: logging as inserts
Date: 2005-03-03 23:43:14
Message-ID: 200503031543.15152.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew,

> Incidentally, the fly in this particular pot of ointment is that we
> potentially log a lot more than just statements.

Oh, yeah, but just about anything can be put in the "statement" field; errors,
disconnects, etc.

Hmmm ... though we don't currently apply "log line prefix" to those, do we?

> Incidentally, %$ doesn't tstrike me as ideal - to conform to the way the
> rest are done we should use an alphabetic character, not $.

Sorry, I'm being perlish ;-)

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-03-04 00:08:13 Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-03-03 22:45:29 Re: logging as inserts