Interesting NetBSD annual report

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Interesting NetBSD annual report
Date: 2005-02-25 04:00:48
Message-ID: 200502250400.j1P40mQ28381@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

I read the following report from the NetBSD group:

http://kerneltrap.org/node/4680

It has some interesting points. First, they analyze how the fit with
other open source database offerings. Their position is somewhat
similar to ours.

Their development style is also similar to ours.

They complain about release delays and the challenge of organizing
volunteers, just like us.

Second, they have a much more rigid hierarchy structure. There are good
and bad things about that and you can see it in the report.

Third, they admit they don't have the get*ent_r() functions we need for
thread-safety on that platform.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-02-25 10:34:12 Development Plans
Previous Message Ned Lilly 2005-02-24 18:03:55 Re: MS SQL server stuff

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-02-25 04:33:39 Re: BUG #1466: syslogger issues
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-02-25 03:22:16 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c