| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Finding if old transactions are running... |
| Date: | 2005-02-25 01:11:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200502250111.j1P1Bhk11781@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> >> It sure would be nice to be able to have a way to query the start time
> >> of the eldest transaction on the system. If that could be done at a
> >> not-too-high cost, it would be eminently helpful for various sorts of
> >> maintenance processes so that you could assortedly:
>
> > You can get that from pg_stat_activity, if you have the relevant stats
> > turned on.
>
> pg_stat_activity will tell you about the oldest active query, but not
> about oldest open transaction.
And pg_stat_activity can lose information when the network is under
heavy load too.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-25 01:34:01 | Re: Where are we on stored procedures? |
| Previous Message | John Hansen | 2005-02-25 00:45:54 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 |