| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Get rid of system attributes in pg_attribute? |
| Date: | 2005-02-20 15:48:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200502201048.20937.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday 20 February 2005 00:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> > If I am understanding this correctly, they could only be displayed if
> > selected explicitly right?
>
> That's always been true. The behavior at the level of SQL commands
> wouldn't change. The question is whether any apps out there examine
> pg_attribute and expect these rows to be present. Most of the code
> I've seen that examines pg_attribute explicitly disregards rows with
> attnum < 0 ...
>
One of us is not understanding the other :-) I'm asking if I have a piece of
code that does something like select attname from pg_attribute where attrelid
= 'stock'::regclass::oid with the intent of displaying all those attnames,
then the "system atts" will no longer show up in that list, correct? I'm
asking cause I have some code that does something like this at work so
wondering if I need to do some further investigating come Tuesday morning.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2005-02-20 16:02:25 | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |
| Previous Message | pgsql | 2005-02-20 14:44:52 | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |