| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Hicham G(dot) Elmongui" <elmongui(at)cs(dot)purdue(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: enforcing a plan (in brief) |
| Date: | 2005-02-15 03:56:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200502150356.j1F3ugq07918@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com writes:
> > I think that is sort of arrogant. Look at Oracle, you can give the planner
> > hints in the form of comments.
>
> Arrogant or not, that's the general view of the people who work on the
> planner.
>
> The real issue is not so much whether the planner will always get things
> right --- it won't, and no one imagines that it will ever be perfect.
> The real issue is that we have limited manpower, and designing and
> implementing a useful hint facility is a nontrivial project. (Not to
> mention that maintaining such a thing in the face of frequent,
> fundamental changes to the underlying planner and executor capabilities
> would be an outright nightmare.)
And the user maintenance of updating those hints for every release of
PostgreSQL as we improve the database engine.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-15 04:02:43 | Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-02-15 03:55:38 | Re: getting oid of function |