From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Milla Erdee <millueradfa(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Question regarding threaded mode |
Date: | 2005-02-14 16:02:19 |
Message-ID: | 20050214160214.GE25264@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:12:50PM -0500, Milla Erdee wrote:
> First, I appreciate PostgreSQL's extensive support for SQL and its
> feature set greatly, which is why I use it, because of its extensive and
> powerful features not found on some other SQL implementations and I hope
> that the capabilities of it will continue to be expanded and improved.
>
> Does PostGRESQL support or will it support a threaded server mode? Will
> such a mode be available on Unix-type systems?
Currently no. There's no real need for it so there's not really a push
for it either.
> Also, has PostgreSQL considered adding some CLOB and BLOB types?
Has had these for ages.
> Updating Views
You can create RULEs to do this.
> Triggers on Views
What would they do?
> Additional Trigger Syntax (ie Oracle):
I'm not seeing anything there more than syntactic sugar that PostgreSQL
doesn't support, but no, it doesn't take that syntax.
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-02-14 16:03:24 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card |
Previous Message | Cristian Prieto | 2005-02-14 15:35:40 | I don't know what to do! |