From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | performance pgsql <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Benchmark |
Date: | 2005-02-11 13:08:41 |
Message-ID: | 20050211130841.GA5110@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:22:39 -0500,
Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What about the free speech rigths, in USA they are in the constitution
> and cannot be denied or revoked, IANAL.
You can voluntarily give up your rights to free speech in the US.
> And like stated by Mitch just numbers are not lies that can be pursued
> in a court of law.
I think part of the reason they don't want people doing this, is because
if you don't configure their database well, you can make it look bad
when it shouldn't.
> Think anout it, In USA you can speak and publish about the President
> but cannot say anything about M$ or Oracles' DBMS?
Not if you signed a contract that says you can't.
If you didn't actually sign an agreement saying you wouldn't publish
benchmarks, then you might have a case. You might argue that a click
through eula isn't a valid contract or that you are a third party
who isn't bound by whatever agreement the person who installed Oracle
made. However it probably would cost you a bundle to have a chance
at winning.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-02-11 13:16:29 | Re: Benchmark |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-02-11 10:20:02 | Re: How to interpret this explain analyse? |