| From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan <jan(at)fastpitchcentral(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_affected Change Request |
| Date: | 2005-02-10 05:53:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20050210055339.GA59314@winnie.fuhr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:50:41PM -0500, Jan wrote:
> I've been using PostgreSQL for about three months. So far my
> only objection is that "pg_affected" provides the number of attempts
> rather than the number of rows that are actually changed. I could
> easily do that with a little counter.
Please provide some context: What "pg_affected" are you talking
about? How are you determining that it provides "attempts" instead
of "actual"?
> I think PostgreSQL should be changed to return the number of rows
> actually changed (whether updated, inserted or deleted).
Please provide an example of what you're doing, what results you
expect or would like to see, and what results you actually get.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Együd Csaba | 2005-02-10 06:32:35 | Any functions to convert bit(5) to text? |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-02-10 05:10:45 | Re: Understanding EXPLAIN ANALYZE output |