| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Query optimizer 8.0.1 (and 8.0) |
| Date: | 2005-02-09 23:35:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200502092335.j19NZPd26392@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Mark, Stephen, etc:
>
> > > I can see your point, however I wonder if the issue is that the default
> > > stats settings of '10' (3000 rows, 10 histogram buckets) is too low, and
> > > maybe we should consider making a higher value (say '100') the default.
> >
> > Personally, I think that'd be reasonable.
>
> I don't really think that we want to increase sampling for *all* columns.
> Each column that doesn't get queried but has increased stats adds the size of
> the pg_stats table and the amount of vacuuming it needs, decreasing
> performance of stats lookups. Especially when very large text and BYTEA
> columns are involved.
>
> Neil and I talked about setting a seperate GUC, default_index_stats_target,
> for 8.0 that would dramatically increase the stats sampling for indexed
> columns only (say, to 250). Unfortunately, I was unable to come up with a
> good test case for setting this value.
Is default_index_stats_target a TODO item? Seems we already have cases
where our bucket size isn't large enough and this would help.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pgsql | 2005-02-10 00:30:16 | Re: Query optimizer 8.0.1 (and 8.0) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-02-09 23:05:39 | Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0 |