Re: External Projects in the PostgreSQL release

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Noah Friedland <noah(at)sourcelabs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: External Projects in the PostgreSQL release
Date: 2005-02-08 10:48:49
Message-ID: 20050208104846.GB10151@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:10:32PM -0800, Noah Friedland wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was wondering if any external projects get bundled into the Postgres
> release, e.g. JDBC, etc. I'd like to get a better sense of the process. How
> are decisions made as to which external projects to bundle, and who is
> responsible for the quality/interoperability of those projects with the
> core?

I'm sure other people will correct me, but AFAIK there has been an
effort recently to remove things from the main release that are not
actually maintained by the PostgreSQL core. So any project that has
its own developers and timeline is generally distributed by that
project. The PostgreSQL team releases: PostgreSQL.

Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Pingel 2005-02-08 10:50:28 indexing just a part of a string
Previous Message Jan Poslusny 2005-02-08 10:25:47 Re: