Re: Patch Count?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch Count?
Date: 2005-02-07 00:25:22
Message-ID: 20050206202458.T934@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
>> Trolling -hackers for attachments would require a deal of manual
>> attention, unfortunately, because a lot of messages of that kind
>> would be bug reports not patches. I'm not real sure that there
>> aren't some non-patch attachments on -patches as well.
>>
>
> That's why we need a Bug Tracking System. It was discussed some time
> ago and what is the clue? IMHO A BTS is an essencial part in the
> software development process.

So that we can count # of patch submitters? :)

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-02-07 00:30:37 Thinking about breaking up the BufMgrLock
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-02-06 23:05:36 Inline MemoryContextSwitchTo?