Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0
Date: 2005-02-02 23:46:11
Message-ID: 200502022346.j12NkBa11866@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Well, if you just want to bump libpq's SO_MAJOR_VERSION, I won't
> > object.
>
> Yes. Unless someone objects, I will do that for 8.0.* and 8.1.*.

I am thinking we should up the 8.0.* and 8.1.* releases to have the same
major number, but not make a major libpq bump for every major release
unless it is required, like with prog_name. Is that the plan?

I guess the big question is whether we would ever want a 7.2 psql or any
other client to automatically use a 7.3 libpq. In fact by upping the
major every time will 7.2 clients automatically use the 7.3 libpq or
will they have to be relinked?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-02-02 23:49:59 Re: pg_dump bug in 7.3.9 with sequences
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-02-02 22:46:12 Re: FunctionCallN improvement.

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-02-02 23:53:08 Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-02-02 22:00:07 Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0