Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system
Date: 2005-02-02 18:35:20
Message-ID: 200502021835.j12IZKA04787@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

William Yu wrote:
> >>You can get 64-bit Xeons also but it takes hit in the I/O department due
> >>to the lack of a hardware I/O MMU which limits DMA transfers to
> >>addresses below 4GB. This has a two-fold impact:
> >>
> >>1) transfering data to >4GB require first a transfer to <4GB and then a
> >>copy to the final destination.
> >>
> >>2) You must allocate real memory 2X the address space of the devices to
> >>act as bounce buffers. This is especially problematic for workstations
> >>because if you put a 512MB Nvidia card in your computer for graphics
> >>work -- you've just lost 1GB of memory. (I dunno how much the typical
> >>SCSI/NIC/etc take up.)

When you say "allocate real memory 2X" are you saying that if you have
16GB of RAM only 8GB is actually usable and the other 8GB is for
bounce buffers, or is it just address space being used up?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message William Yu 2005-02-02 18:49:35 Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system
Previous Message Markus Schaber 2005-02-02 18:25:15 Re: Bad query optimizer misestimation because of TOAST