From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | frederic(dot)germaneau(at)bull(dot)net, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: R?f. : Re: R?f. : Re: [PORTS] |
Date: | 2005-02-02 18:16:27 |
Message-ID: | 200502021816.j12IGRl02047@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> frederic(dot)germaneau(at)bull(dot)net wrote:
> > I choose this naming to avoid corrupting any already installed older
> > version;
> > (i.e. my old postgresql 7 rpm create also a postgre7 user, and the 2
> > versions work at the same time on the same server (I just need to
> > change one postmaster port))
>
> If you distinguish between PostgreSQL 7 and PostgreSQL 8 then you have a
> grave misunderstanding about the PostgreSQL version numbering. The
> major version numbers go ... 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 8.0, 8.1, ... The change
> from 7 to 8 is purely arbitrary. So to make sense you should create
> users postgre72, postgre73, postgre74, postgre80, etc., otherwise it's
> just random.
I wonder if we should define major/minor version numbers somewhere, like
in the FAQ?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Almeida do Lago | 2005-02-03 10:10:39 | Re: Postgres install on windows 2003 server |
Previous Message | Paulo Rogerio Zimolo | 2005-02-02 17:14:55 | DATA DIRECTORY IS MISSING |