Re: [pgsql-hackers] Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers] Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema
Date: 2005-01-29 14:14:38
Message-ID: 20050129141438.GB10437@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Or just make the user enter two commands for this case. Aside from
> syntactic simplicity, that might be a good idea anyway. The NEW TABLES
> case is *fundamentally* different from every other form of GRANT, in
> that it causes future actions. So it might be a wise idea from the
> standpoint of understandability to keep it as a separate command from
> the immediate-acting ALL TABLES.

I agree with this- issueing two seperate commands in this instance seems
like it'd be fine and not terribly onerous.

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2005-01-29 14:23:11 Allowing VACUUM to time out when waiting for locks?
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2005-01-29 12:04:36 Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql