Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date: 2005-01-28 15:36:20
Message-ID: 20050128153620.GE9076@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:28:29AM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> IIRC it hates pg_dump mainly on master. If you are able to run pg_dump
> from slave, it should be ok.

For the sake of the archives, that's not really a good idea. There
is some work afoot to solve it, but at the moment dumping from a
slave gives you a useless database dump.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Turner 2005-01-28 15:39:52 Bitmap indexes
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2005-01-28 15:34:25 Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering