From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Lee Jensen <ljensen(at)carriersales(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: plpython triggers TD["new"] = None |
Date: | 2005-01-27 23:11:50 |
Message-ID: | 20050127231150.GB27963@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 04:01:32PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:46:54PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 03:34:55PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> >
> > > OLD and NEW don't make sense in statement-level triggers because
> > > the statement could affect many rows. Use FOR EACH ROW if you need
> > > to access the row values.
> >
> > IMHO they do make sense. It's just that they haven't been implemented.
>
> What do you have in mind? What would OLD and NEW refer to in
> statements that affect multiple rows? Are you thinking of a way
> to refer to all of the old and new rows?
Yes, exactly that. They would be arrays of tuples (or whatever they are
called in Python -- I'm not thinking specifically in Python.)
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Escucha y olvidarás; ve y recordarás; haz y entenderás" (Confucio)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-01-27 23:23:10 | Re: plpython triggers TD["new"] = None |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-01-27 23:01:32 | Re: plpython triggers TD["new"] = None |