From: | "Keith Worthington" <keithw(at)narrowpathinc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: hardware mod based on feedback from the list |
Date: | 2005-01-27 17:35:56 |
Message-ID: | 20050127172931.M49435@narrowpathinc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:11:55 +0000, Richard Huxton wrote
> > Joel Fradkin wrote:
> >
> > I was told the Xeon processors will do fine up to 64gig. I
> > realize the 64bit chips may be faster, but it is also new
> > and I feel safer with existing technologies and hardware
> > vendors.
> >
> > My understanding is that CPU (4 Xeon 3gig processors) will
> > not be a issue, but hopefully adding the additional drive
> > systems will help the most for IO is what I am told is the
> > big issue and hopefully utilizing the recommendation will
> > help minimize the bottleneck.
>
> I believe there may well be an issue with multiple Xeon's - check
> the mailing list archives for details.
>
> --
> Richard Huxton
> Archonet Ltd
Joel,
I am currently running PostgreSQL v8.0.0 using RedHat Enterprise Linux v3 on a
Dell with '2 PROCESSOR, 80532K, 2.8GHZ, 512K, 533, DECISION ONE'.
So far so good. :-)
Kind Regards,
Keith
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sean Davis | 2005-01-27 18:02:42 | Re: What's the equivalent in PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | Wilton | 2005-01-27 17:32:10 | Function Doubt |