Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2
Date: 2005-01-25 18:58:03
Message-ID: 20050125185802.GG12529@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:51:27PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:

Merlin,

> 2. (proposing) new system type that covers the maximum bitspace allowed
> inside locktag structure, and add a union here to reduce confusion
> (encompassing offsetnum but not lockmethodid).

Please search this message in the archives:

To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] LockObject patch
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:22:30 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Oh, great altar of passive entertainment, bestow upon me thy discordant images
at such speed as to render linear thought impossible" (Calvin a la TV)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-25 19:01:55 Re: Heads up: upcoming releases in all branches back to 7.2
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-01-25 18:55:33 Re: improved support for compounds in tsearch2