Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
Date: 2005-01-25 16:25:47
Message-ID: 20050125162547.GA6901@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 15:14:04 -0500,
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> It's not entirely clear to me whether the spec allows roles to be
> directly owners of objects, but I think we should allow it.

I aggree with this. This can simplify maintainance as members of a group
come and go.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-25 16:39:35 Re: how to add a new column in pg_proc table
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-01-25 15:57:02 Re: how to add a new column in pg_proc table

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-25 16:28:57 Re: pg_autovacuum Win32 Service startup delay
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-01-25 16:20:53 Re: pg_autovacuum Win32 Service startup delay