From: | mrblonde(at)locked(dot)myftp(dot)org |
---|---|
To: | franco(at)akyasociados(dot)com(dot)ar |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: update from multiple rows |
Date: | 2005-01-24 23:32:20 |
Message-ID: | 20050124233220.6CA161C00085@mwinf1206.wanadoo.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Thanks a lot.. That is what i searched.. In fact your query is very good for little changes, but i will have to use another method when updating all my rows because the performance is not very good alas.
My data set contains something like 40000 rows to update in 1+ million records and data_raw, data_sys are of type "real"... The complete update took 40 minutes on a 256Mo, athlon 2400, kernel 2.6 and with no charge during the execution of the query.
Is this normal ? The number of columns of the table does it matter a lot (the table contains 12 reals and 4 integers) ?
I found that using an intermediate table which stock for every row the value before and the value after helps to gain speed... But it is not a very nice way i think..
Thanks again :)
Etienne
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Fradkin | 2005-01-25 15:11:40 | datediff is there something like it? |
Previous Message | Dmitri Bichko | 2005-01-24 19:10:51 | Value specific sequences? |