Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Ragnar Hafstað <gnari(at)simnet(dot)is>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Date: 2005-01-24 23:45:51
Message-ID: 200501241545.51737.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ragnar,

> note that these sometimes do not provide connection pooling as such,
> just persistent connections (Apache::DBI)

Yes, right.

> no. you can only count on web-server-process==connection, but not
> web-user==connection, unless you can garantee that the same user
> client always connects to same web-server process.

Are there ones that you use which might use several different connections to
send a series of queries from a single web-user, less than 5 seconds apart?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2005-01-25 00:21:09 Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Previous Message Litao Wu 2005-01-24 23:02:42 reltuples after vacuum and analyze