From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2 |
Date: | 2005-01-22 23:42:58 |
Message-ID: | 20050122234258.GA1618@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:21:32PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what's the relation between the tables in pg_catalog
> and the 'actual system objects'? I ass-u-me'd that these tables were the
> backing store for the real information, but maybe that's not the case.
They are.
> I think these views are also very useful in certain programming
> situations, in which also having the OIDs might be very useful. Another
> option would be to have functions that given a array of names would
> return a array of OIDs.
So why not have both in the view? It's not like you are storing
duplicated data anyway.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Ellos andaban todos desnudos como su madre los parió, y también las mujeres,
aunque no vi más que una, harto moza, y todos los que yo vi eran todos
mancebos, que ninguno vi de edad de más de XXX años" (Cristóbal Colón)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2005-01-23 00:08:47 | Re: [HACKERS] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32 |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-01-22 23:21:32 | Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2 |