Re:

From: Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de>
To: Matt Casters <Matt(dot)Casters(at)advalvas(dot)be>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2005-01-21 12:30:08
Message-ID: 20050121123008.GA13904@zoom.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:50:46AM +0100, Matt Casters wrote:
>
> > Some people have been doing it using a union view. There isn't actually
> > a partition feature.
>
> Actually, there is. If found this example on pgsql-performance:
>
> >> CREATE TABLE super_foo ( partition NUMERIC, bar NUMERIC );
> >> ANALYZE super_foo ;
> >>
> >> CREATE TABLE sub_foo1 () INHERITS ( super_foo );
[...]
> >>
> >> CREATE TABLE sub_foo2 () INHERITS ( super_foo );
[...]
> >>

Yes, this could be used instead of a view. But there is one thing
missing. You can't just insert into super_foo and aquire the "correct
partition". You will still have to insert into the correct underlying
table. "Real" partitioning will take care of correct partition
selection.

Regards,
Yann

In response to

  • Re: at 2005-01-21 08:50:46 from Matt Casters

Responses

  • Re: at 2005-01-21 12:51:02 from Matt Casters
  • Re: at 2005-01-21 14:37:20 from Matteo Beccati

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Casters 2005-01-21 12:51:02 Re:
Previous Message Bernd Heller 2005-01-21 09:55:00 Re: column without pg_stats entry?!