From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | andrzej <wppl16(at)wp(dot)pl> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1408: don't see index |
Date: | 2005-01-20 20:28:45 |
Message-ID: | 20050120202845.GA30746@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:01:29 +0000,
andrzej <wppl16(at)wp(dot)pl> wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 1408
> Logged by: andrzej
> Email address: wppl16(at)wp(dot)pl
> PostgreSQL version: 8.0.0-rc5
> Operating system: windows XP
> Description: don't see index
> Details:
>
> Create table t1
> (
> v varchar(5) not null,
> m varchar(20),
> d date,
> l varchar(10),
> primary key(v)
> );
>
> explain select * from t1 where v='abc'
> result:
> Seq Scan on t1 (....
> Filter:((v)::text='abc'::text)
> DON'T SEE INDEX PKEY ???????!!!!
>
> but Postgres 7.4.2 Linux
> explain select * from t1 where v='abc'
> result:
> Index Scan using t1_pkey on t1(...
> Index Cond((v)::text='abc'::text)
> SEE INDEX PKEY OK !!!!!
This probably isn't a bug. In some circumstances a sequential scan is faster
than an index scan.
How many rows are in this table?
Have you run an ANALYZE on the table?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-01-20 20:42:42 | Re: BUG #1421: Will not install in TS |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2005-01-20 19:54:11 | Re: BUG #1409: A good and a bad news: Crazy SQL JOIN? |