Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?
Date: 2005-01-18 17:11:10
Message-ID: 20050118131028.F96603@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Quite so. Only by direct hacking on the ,v files, AFAIK - i.e. NOT
> something to be done except in dire emergency. As long as nobody commits
> to the branch is there any harm done by leaving it there? I presume all
> the committers know which branch they should be committing to (and also
> that most other than Tom only rarely commit to anything other than HEAD)

This is what we figured, I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't
overlooking something ... risk is minimal, but eliminating it would have
been nice if possible :)

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-01-18 18:34:43 Re: psql 8.0 final not working on NT 4.0sp6
Previous Message Reinhard Max 2005-01-18 17:07:29 Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?