From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Dean <mdean(at)sourceview(dot)com> |
Cc: | Randolf Richardson <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>, pgsql-benchmarks(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Date: | 2005-01-14 15:41:08 |
Message-ID: | 200501141541.j0EFf8i29180@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-benchmarks |
Michael Dean wrote:
> Also keep in mind that CA released Ingre (forerunner to Postgre), IBM
> released the improved code from Informix, and Borland firebird. So
What source code has IBM released?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> there are plenty of commercial grade RDBMS out there.
>
> Randolf Richardson wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for recent performance statistics on PostgreSQL vs. Oracle
> >vs. Microsoft SQL Server. Recently someone has been trying to convince my
> >client to switch from SyBASE to Microsoft SQL Server (they originally wanted
> >to go with Oracle but have since fallen in love with Microsoft). All this
> >time I've been recommending PostgreSQL for cost and stability (my own testing
> >has shown it to be better at handling abnormal shutdowns and using fewer
> >system resources) in addition to true cross-platform compatibility.
> >
> > If I can show my client some statistics that PostgreSQL outperforms
> >these (I'm more concerned about it beating Oracle because I know that
> >Microsoft's stuff is always slower, but I need the information anyway to
> >protect my client from falling victim to a 'sales job'), then PostgreSQL will
> >be the solution of choice as the client has always believed that they need a
> >high-performance solution.
> >
> > I've already convinced them on the usual price, cross-platform
> >compatibility, open source, long history, etc. points, and I've been assured
> >that if the performance is the same or better than Oracle's and Microsoft's
> >solutions that PostgreSQL is what they'll choose.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-14 16:03:43 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2005-01-14 01:04:45 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |