Re: pgpool

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: John Cunningham <fatbobo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: General PostgreSQL list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgpool
Date: 2005-01-13 21:06:12
Message-ID: 200501132206.13221.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

John Cunningham wrote:
> concerned that if I drop the number of connections to less than the
> number of databases I have, that pgpool would open the limit of
> connections, hold them open and not allow any connections to the
> remaining databases. Is this a concern? If I set up pgpool will I
> have to have the same number of connections as I have databases?

That depends on how you configure pgpool. pgpool is not aware of the
connection limit count in the PostgreSQL server, so it will happily
open connections until there are no more slots available.

pgpool will require max_pool * num_init_children connection slots.
max_pool should be the number of database/user combinations you use
(300 in your case, assuming only one database user account), and
num_init_children should be on the order of how many concurrent
connections you expect to each combination ("several" in your case).
So you should have at least 300 * several PostgreSQL connection slots,
which is probably more than the 1000 or so that is the default.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

  • pgpool at 2005-01-13 18:15:52 from John Cunningham

Responses

  • Re: pgpool at 2005-01-13 21:10:52 from John Cunningham
  • Re: pgpool at 2005-01-15 02:12:04 from Tatsuo Ishii

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Cunningham 2005-01-13 21:10:52 Re: pgpool
Previous Message Frank D. Engel, Jr. 2005-01-13 21:04:51 Re: best place to enfore rules