Re: does "select count(*) from mytable" always do a seq

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: alex(at)neteconomist(dot)com
Cc: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>, Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: does "select count(*) from mytable" always do a seq
Date: 2005-01-10 16:34:46
Message-ID: 20050110163446.GA30793@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:26:46 -0500,
Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance, but I'm still learning about much of this stuff.
> If you perform:
>
> select an_id, int_value from my_table where int_value>400;
>
> The table has an index on int_value and there are enough rows to
> warrant using it. Doesn't the database perform in index scan on
> int_value followed by a retrieve for the datablocks with relavent oids
> to get the an_id field?

I don't think that oids are used in the process, but if the planner thinks
an index scan would be better it will use one.

> If another transaction has inserted rows into this table, won't the
> index have been updated, and contain new row references? Does this
> imply that the database must retrieve the row information to determine
> if the row is a row from a different transaction?

When doing an index scan, the heap tuples still need to be checked for
visibility to the current transaction.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Turner 2005-01-10 16:51:51 Re: does "select count(*) from mytable" always do a seq
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2005-01-10 16:28:08 Function for retreiving datatype